Legal Services: - Review of decision that the applicant was not a priority need and intentionally homeless. - HOU003/0222/CRH

Date of decision: Friday, September 30, 2016

---

Service area: Legal Services

---

What decision was taken?
That the applicant was a priority and intentionally homeless (delegated authority C3A.18 (b)).

---

Reason(s)for decision:
Request made for a review of decision that the applicant was not a priority need and intentionally homeless.

---

Alternative(s) considered (if any):
Uphold the officers decision that the applicant was not a priority need and intentionally homeless.

Find that the applicant was a priority need but not intentionally homeless.

Find that the applicant was not a priority need but intentionally homeless.

---

Background papers (if any):
Officers file.

Application form.

---

Any other information (e.g. name of Councillor who has declared a conflict of interest in the matter):
N/A

---

Back to officer decision register

---